Home
My Account
About Us
Forum
Contact us
الواجهة العربية
epharmaweb.com
Medical News Medical News
Aricles Articles
Events Events
Guidelines Guidelines
Videos Library Videos Library
Diseases Diseases
Follow us : facebook twitter Digg Linkedin Boxiz
Newsletter

Please select the categories you are intersted in:
News Articles Guidelines Events Videos Journals' abstracts

Latest Subscribers
Advanced Search »



Integrating static and dynamic features of melanoma



Integrating static and dynamic features of melanoma

Timo Buhl, MD, Christian Hansen-Hagge, MD, Bianca Korpas, Kjell M. Kaune, MD, Ellen Haas, MD, Albert Rosenberger, MD, Michael P. Schön, MD, Steffen Emmert, MD, Holger A. Haenssle, MD

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology,
66:1, June 09, 2011

Integrating static and dynamic features of melanoma

Background
Sequential digital dermatoscopy identifies dynamic changes in melanocytic lesions. However, no algorithm exists that systematically weights dynamic changes regarding their association with melanoma.


Objective
We sought to identify relevant dynamic changes and to integrate these into a novel diagnostic algorithm.


Methods
During follow-up (mean 44.28 months) of 688 patients at high risk, 675 pigmented lesions with prospectively documented dynamic changes were excised. The association between specific changes and melanoma was assessed.


Results
We detected 61 melanomas (38 invasive, median thickness 0.42 mm) with dynamic changes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between the diagnosis of melanoma and 5 dynamic criteria. According to the observed odds ratios we defined two dynamic major criteria (2 points each: asymmetric-multifocal enlargement and architectural change) and 3 dynamic minor criteria (1 point each: focal increase in pigmentation, focal decrease in pigmentation, and overall decrease in pigmentation when not accompanied by a lighter pigmentation of the adjacent skin). The DynaMel score was generated by addition of dynamic and 7-point checklist scores with a threshold for excision of 3 or more points. Including information about dynamic changes increased the sensitivity of the 7-point checklist from 47.5% (29 of 61 melanomas detected) to 77.1% (47 of 61 melanomas detected). The specificity slightly decreased from 99.0% to 98.1%.


Limitations
Before broad application the DynaMel algorithm needs to be validated using data from a different prospective study.


Conclusions
The DynaMel algorithm integrates a scoring system for dynamic dermatoscopic changes into the 7-point checklist for dermatoscopy and thereby increased the sensitivity of melanoma detection.







اضغط هنا للقراءة باللغة العربية

Prepared by: Dr. Houssam Al-Nahhas






Forgot your password


sign up

Consultants Corner

Dr. Talal Sabouni

Dr. Talal Sabouni UROLOGY AND KIDNEY TRANSPLANT

Dr. Hani Najjar

Dr. Hani Najjar Pediatrics, Neurology

Dr. Faisal Dibsi

Dr. Faisal Dibsi Specialist of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Yaser Habrawi , F.R.C.S.Ed

Yaser Habrawi , F.R.C.S.Ed Consultant Ophthalmologist

Dr . Dirar Abboud

Dr . Dirar Abboud Hepatologist – Gastroenterologist

Samir Moussa M.D.

Samir Moussa M.D. ENT Specialist

Dr. Samer Al-Jneidy

Dr. Samer Al-Jneidy Pediatrician

Dr. Tahsin Martini

Dr. Tahsin Martini Degree status: M.D. in Ophthalmology
Poll

Which of the following you are mostly interested in?

Cancer Research
Mental Health
Heart Disease & Diabetes
Sexual Health
Obesity and Healthy Diets
Mother & Child Health

Disclaimer : This site does not endorse or recommend any medical treatment, pharmaceuticals or brand names. More Details